The balanced scorecard was designed by
Drs. Robert Kaplan (Harvard Business School) and David Norton
as a performance measurement framework that added strategic
non-financial performance measures to traditional financial
metrics to give managers and executives a more 'balanced'
view of organizational performance.
The balanced scorecard
has evolved from its early use as a simple performance measurement
framework to a full strategic planning and management system.
The “new” balanced scorecard transforms an organization’s
strategic plan from an attractive but passive document into
the "marching orders" for the organization on
a daily basis. It provides a framework that not only provides
performance measurements, but helps planners identify what
should be done and measured. It enables executives to truly
execute their strategies.
Financial measures, while
very important only tell the story of past events
They are however, inadequate for guiding and evaluating
the journey that information age companies must make to
create future value through investment in customers, suppliers,
employees, processes, technology, and innovation.

Adapted from The
Balanced Scorecard by Kaplan & Norton
The
balanced scorecard suggests that we view the organization
from four perspectives, and to develop metrics, collect
data and analyze it relative to each of these perspectives:
- The
Learning & Growth Perspective
- The
Business Process Perspective
- The
Customer Perspective
- The
Financial Perspective
The Learning
& Growth Perspective
This perspective includes employee training and
corporate cultural attitudes related to both individual
and corporate self-improvement. In a knowledge-worker organization,
people -- the only repository of knowledge -- are the main
resource. In the current climate of rapid technological
change, it is becoming necessary for knowledge workers to
be in a continuous learning mode. Metrics can be put into
place to guide managers in focusing training funds where
they can help the most. In any case, learning and growth
constitute the essential foundation for success of any knowledge-worker
organization.
Kaplan and Norton emphasize
that 'learning' is more than 'training'; it also includes
things like mentors and tutors within the organization,
as well as that ease of communication among workers that
allows them to readily get help on a problem when it is
needed. It also includes technological tools; what the Baldrige
criteria call "high performance work systems."
The Business Process Perspective
This perspective refers to internal business processes.
Metrics based on this perspective allow the managers to
know how well their business is running, and whether its
products and services conform to customer requirements (the
mission). These metrics have to be carefully designed by
those who know these processes most intimately; with our
unique missions these are not something that can be developed
by outside consultants.
The Customer Perspective
Recent management philosophy has shown an increasing realization
of the importance of customer focus and customer satisfaction
in any business. These are leading indicators: if customers
are not satisfied, they will eventually find other suppliers
that will meet their needs. Poor performance from this perspective
is thus a leading indicator of future decline, even though
the current financial picture may look good.
In developing metrics for satisfaction,
customers should be analyzed in terms of kinds of customers
and the kinds of processes for which we are providing a
product or service to those customer groups.
The Financial Perspective
Kaplan and Norton do not disregard the traditional need
for financial data. Timely and accurate funding data will
always be a priority, and managers will do whatever necessary
to provide it. In fact, often there is more than enough
handling and processing of financial data. With the implementation
of a corporate database, it is hoped that more of the processing
can be centralized and automated. But the point is that
the current emphasis on financials leads to the "unbalanced"
situation with regard to other perspectives. There
is perhaps a need to include additional financial-related
data, such as risk assessment and cost-benefit data, in
this category.